Skip to content

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

Description

Closes #1615

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@joelanford joelanford requested a review from a team as a code owner January 19, 2025 19:15
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit cfb2c7b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/678df0ef7b0a3f0008f09593
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1638--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.78%. Comparing base (96972f0) to head (cfb2c7b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1638      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.76%   66.78%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        4600     4585      -15     
==========================================
- Hits         3071     3062       -9     
+ Misses       1303     1299       -4     
+ Partials      226      224       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 53.37% <100.00%> (+0.28%) ⬆️
unit 53.67% <100.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

}

successorsPredicate, err := successors(installedBundle, channels...)
successorsPredicate, err := legacySuccessor(installedBundle, channels...)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @joelanford

Any reason why we should not remove the unused funcs raised by the lint?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope! Pushed an amended commit to fix.

@joelanford joelanford force-pushed the rm-force-semver-upgrade-graph branch from a815014 to cfb2c7b Compare January 20, 2025 06:45
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2025
@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit a62d3bf Jan 20, 2025
23 checks passed
@joelanford joelanford deleted the rm-force-semver-upgrade-graph branch February 14, 2025 19:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove ForceSemverUpgradeConstraints feature gate and implementation

2 participants